Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,869 Year: 4,126/9,624 Month: 997/974 Week: 324/286 Day: 45/40 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Justification of Science?
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 26 of 39 (407177)
06-24-2007 9:06 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by WS-JW
06-23-2007 2:10 AM


quote:
If you shut the door to your room, and think of these things, you come to the conclusion you were made and there is a God, why? because it's logical and makes sense.
Of course, if you then come out of your room, and actually get a science degree, or at least take a few college-level science courses, you see that what you thought while you were thinking all alone in your room, was wrong.
You see, ignorance is not a good basis for determining the truth of any natural phenomena.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by WS-JW, posted 06-23-2007 2:10 AM WS-JW has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 34 of 39 (407744)
06-28-2007 10:09 AM
Reply to: Message 27 by WS-JW
06-26-2007 2:07 PM


So, are you saying that all Biologists have, for at least a century, perpetuated a massive fraud upon the rest of the scientific community, such that other fields like Geology and Genetics?
If so, how is it that scientists in those other fields are able to make successful predictions based upon the untruth of Evolutionary Biology?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by WS-JW, posted 06-26-2007 2:07 PM WS-JW has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 35 of 39 (407745)
06-28-2007 10:13 AM
Reply to: Message 29 by WS-JW
06-26-2007 2:33 PM


Let us for a moment accept your premise, that Evolution is false and that God created everything however it is that you say He did.
Now what?
What greater understanding of nature have we gained?
Will future research findings spring from this conclusion?
How useful is it?
Edited by nator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by WS-JW, posted 06-26-2007 2:33 PM WS-JW has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024