almeyda writes:
The evidence for a old earth is not as overwhelming as it looks. Especially when Creationists find overwhelming evidence for a young earth. There both based on assumptions. For example : 5 layers means 5 million yrs thats just a theory. There is no way to date the age of the earth It cant be proven with a dating method or observing the present just and idea of what may have happened. Luckily for us Creationists we are basing it on a book of God who says he was there when it happened!...The evidence cant be all that bad since Creationists are standing just as tall against todays Evolutionists.
I'm a little irritated by your rampaging from thread to thread asserting that creationists have overwhelming evidence for a young Earth and that evolutionists have poor evidence for an old Earth.
Please go to
this thread for explanations on scientific dating methods. You really need to take a break and read through this thread before you make more unsupported assertions.
I've been going easy on you and not
demand from you explanations and evidence for your young earth assertions, but my patience has dried out.
The Laminator
™ Version 4.2