Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 80 (8897 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 03-19-2019 1:25 PM
183 online now:
14174dm, edge, kjsimons, PaulK, Percy (Admin), ringo, Tangle, xongsmith (8 members, 175 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: WookieeB
Post Volume:
Total: 848,459 Year: 3,496/19,786 Month: 491/1,087 Week: 81/212 Day: 11/31 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Prev1
...
56789
10
Author Topic:   The Scientific Method For Beginners
Modulous
Member (Idle past 178 days)
Posts: 7789
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 136 of 138 (522133)
09-01-2009 11:26 AM
Reply to: Message 135 by Dr Adequate
09-01-2009 10:40 AM


Re: Tentativity
Unfortunately, the scientific method requires us to not take any empirical claim has guaranteed true - even (perhaps especially!?) the ones we are most sure of.

It requires us to take lots of empirical claims as true.

I agree - in order to advance we have to assume certain previous things are true. The use of the word 'guaranteed' was meant to emphatically emphasise that we must be aware of what those assumptions are, and be willing to test, challenge and revise those assumptions.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-01-2009 10:40 AM Dr Adequate has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 137 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-01-2009 11:57 AM Modulous has acknowledged this reply

  
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16085
Joined: 07-20-2006
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 137 of 138 (522135)
09-01-2009 11:57 AM
Reply to: Message 136 by Modulous
09-01-2009 11:26 AM


Re: Tentativity
Your emphasis is on the word "guaranteed". Mine is on the word "take".

Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 136 by Modulous, posted 09-01-2009 11:26 AM Modulous has acknowledged this reply

  
xongsmith
Member
Posts: 1871
From: massachusetts US
Joined: 01-01-2009


Message 138 of 138 (522309)
09-02-2009 12:51 PM
Reply to: Message 115 by kbertsche
08-29-2009 12:03 AM


Re: theories and facts
Is invoking an exchange of virtual gravitons really any better of a why than invoking a gravitational field described by an inverse square law?


Perhaps it is indeed the limitations of linguistics that has led us to encounter things such as "an exchange of virtual gravitons" in the literature. Whose ghostly cloaking cape does that Masked Higgs Boson wear anyway?

Silly me and here I was, thinking that the "Why" was to be sort of left off to the side of the road for now, in favor of a completing a more thorough description of the "What" and "How".


- xongsmith
This message is a reply to:
 Message 115 by kbertsche, posted 08-29-2009 12:03 AM kbertsche has acknowledged this reply

    
Prev1
...
56789
10
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019