a current example of blatant dishonesty is
http://
EvC Forum: Racial Evolution 101
{{additional info added by edit}}
First, to repeat a post of something that has been discussed on another thread, where the content has been challenged on that thread but not answered by the poster in question, is intellectual dishonesty. Redwolf did this on
{Racial evolution 101, thread post #100}, which I pointed out there with
my post #102. He then responded with the post in question, stating:
Posting links to your claim to have debunked something of mine without also posting links to my clear refutation or your lame attempt at debunking is basically dishonest.
(1) Every post is linked to it's replies so there is no cause for complaints of not giving links.
(2) Two of the three posts I listed were unanswered, the third had a weak response that was refuted by a further post of mine that also went unanswered. Thus there was no "clear refutation" of any of the 3 posts that had been listed - there wasn't
any refutation - and to claim such is blatantly dishonest.
[This message has been edited RAZD, 05-02-2004]
we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel
AAmerican
.Zen
[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}