Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolutionary science is fraudulent and/or inaccurate?
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5845 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 13 of 27 (231924)
08-10-2005 2:14 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by nator
08-10-2005 10:16 AM


Please, no replies, this is off-topic. --Admin
Fliesonly suggested this was the crux of your challenge to creos...
By simply claiming that scientists reach faulty conclusions due to a misinterpretation of the data is a rather bold thing to say and is the crux of schrafinators challenged.
Is this true? If so, how do you handle the hypocrisy of making such a challenge when you yourself opened a thread in the Coffee House suggesting that no one can be unbiased in appraising research, which one can only logically assume stretches to creating research as well?
Indeed, you have twice insinuated I must be lying when I said I (or anyone else) can stick to appropriate methodology even if I don't like the conclusion of the research.
It appears that if your coffee house topic is honest, then you should agree that evolutionists will likely create and the reviewers errantly support evolutionary theory driven research due to less than 100% nonbias.
Or are you drawing a distinction between research in social sciences versus theoretical physical sciences? If so, please explain what that distinction is. As far as I understand, methodology is methodology.
This message has been edited by Admin, 08-10-2005 02:26 PM

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by nator, posted 08-10-2005 10:16 AM nator has not replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5845 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 15 of 27 (231934)
08-10-2005 2:30 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Admin
08-10-2005 1:48 PM


Please, no replies, this is off-topic. --Admin
Excuse me, but why is my post off topic? She creates one thread insinuating science cannot possibly be handled without bias, and then this thread which says if creos say the same thing they need evidence or they are wrong.
Should I not place a question on this apparent inconsistency in one of those two threads? I don't see what the point would be on opening a whole new thread to address an issue found within both.
Or let me put it another way, would it be "on topic" to ask why she feels creos need to show such evidence to make such claims, if she also believes science cannot be done in an unbiased fashion. It does seem the latter position absolves creos of having to prove anything.
This message has been edited by holmes, 08-10-2005 02:36 PM
This message has been edited by Admin, 08-10-2005 02:57 PM

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Admin, posted 08-10-2005 1:48 PM Admin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by Admin, posted 08-10-2005 2:55 PM Silent H has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024