Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,469 Year: 3,726/9,624 Month: 597/974 Week: 210/276 Day: 50/34 Hour: 1/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How can Biologists believe in the ToE?
Antioch's Fire
Junior Member (Idle past 5985 days)
Posts: 12
Joined: 11-04-2007


Message 257 of 304 (432139)
11-04-2007 1:48 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by Taz
04-01-2007 9:24 PM


What do those things have to do with evolution?
And i quote... "I'd like to point out that their rejection of ToE also undermines the many many scientific progress over the decades that have saved and fed millions and millions of lives. These same idiots who believe in ToE also created anti-biotics, genetic engineering, and the myriad of other things that define a modern and developed society."
I fail to see how evolution has anything to do with feeding the masses and coming up with vaccines. If you are implying that all the scientists who come up with these things are evolutionsts than you are either ignorant...or i didn't get some kind of joke...
Taz... you have to make sure that you don't start thinking that science is based off of evolution, because it ain't.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Taz, posted 04-01-2007 9:24 PM Taz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 258 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-04-2007 6:48 AM Antioch's Fire has replied
 Message 259 by nator, posted 11-04-2007 8:22 AM Antioch's Fire has not replied
 Message 260 by sidelined, posted 11-04-2007 2:31 PM Antioch's Fire has not replied

Antioch's Fire
Junior Member (Idle past 5985 days)
Posts: 12
Joined: 11-04-2007


Message 261 of 304 (432291)
11-05-2007 3:07 AM
Reply to: Message 258 by Dr Adequate
11-04-2007 6:48 AM


Re: What do those things have to do with evolution?
First, you say that 99.9 percent of all biologists believe in evolution.
1) Where did you get that number? I really think you would be surprised at the number of accredited scientists who do not believe in the theory of evolution.
2) Bringing up a long list of names simply shows that a lot of people agree with you. By no means does that make it correct. I firmly believe that the rule is not set by the majority and a majority cannot make something correct.
3) You implied that some science is based off the theory of evolution. This science ceases to be science when it becomes based off a theory. That is just one of the problems that I find with evolution; parts of the evolutionary theory are 'proven' with other parts of the theory. It cannot be science if it is based off of a theory; especially one with so many unanswered questions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 258 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-04-2007 6:48 AM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 262 by DrJones*, posted 11-05-2007 3:12 AM Antioch's Fire has not replied
 Message 263 by Percy, posted 11-05-2007 11:42 AM Antioch's Fire has not replied
 Message 264 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-05-2007 11:58 AM Antioch's Fire has not replied
 Message 265 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-05-2007 12:02 PM Antioch's Fire has not replied
 Message 268 by subbie, posted 11-09-2007 5:40 PM Antioch's Fire has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024