Evolution isn't science either. Things proven by science are observable, testable and able to be repeated.
Most evidence for evolution come from radiometric dating which scientists assume to be accurate. Radiometric dating cannot be proven to be reliable. if youre test isn't reliable, how could the results be?
The fossil record as evidence is a joke.
The layers of the earth could just as easily prove a world wide flood.
Evolutionists just assume all these things are in spport of evolution. It's one big assumption based on many smaller assumptions. Evolution is not scientific in the slightest