It's pretty easy to take potshots at established facts and theories from the sidelines. You don't need to know anything at all about the subject to "question" claims made by scientists. In fact it's even easier to do so if you don't have your facts straight.
It's a lot harder however to present a consistent theory which models the natural phenomenon and fits all the available data, well enough to overthrow present models. For this reason, such efforts really fail to impress me.
Edited by DarkBoards, : No reason given.
Forbidden
™ Version 4.2
