Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,755 Year: 4,012/9,624 Month: 883/974 Week: 210/286 Day: 17/109 Hour: 1/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   (In)Accuracy of data.
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 760 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 3 of 11 (394802)
04-13-2007 9:48 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Larni
04-13-2007 9:01 AM


It's too hot, just right, cool, etc. But what we don't get is precise interval data; for this we use measuring machines. The best we can get with our senses is a catagorical interpretation of the data.
Example: in 1980 it was hot in Oklahoma. After weeks of temperatures reaching 45C nearly every afternoon, I was standing in the shade waiting for a shuttle bus and thinking, "Gosh! It's pretty pleasant today!" The radio in the bus agreed - it was only 40C that day!
Yeah, Larni: actually measuring things leads to some surprises. The ability to do so seems to me to be one of the big factors separating cultures with technology from non-technological ones. You can't build a pyramid without a measuring tape.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Larni, posted 04-13-2007 9:01 AM Larni has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by Larni, posted 04-13-2007 10:16 AM Coragyps has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024