Jor-el said:
I'm sure that if you were in the oppositions' shoes you would say that at the moment the odds are more in favour of "empirical science" than the opposite being true.
I didn't say whose shoes I was in, did I?
In fact, I can accept evolution without reservations and I can accept the creation story without reservations. I don't see any necessary conflict between the two. But I don't use the Bible as a telephone directory and I don't use it as a science textbook either.
The title of this thread is "The Bible as a starting point...." But what about the Quran? Or the Book of Mormon? Or the Sacred Tome of the Giant Pink Unicorn? We can't use any of them as a "starting point" because we can't agree on which one to use. By merely suggesting the Bible as a starting point, you're trying to slant the playing field in it's favour.
You can't start a meaningful discussion by asking everybody to accept your interpretation of the Bible. You have to start out by deciding which of your
own subjective beliefs you can set aside.
People who think they have all the answers usually don't understand the questions.