Sorry I missed this one. But if it's not too late, allow me to add this:
David Fitch writes:
As a university prof. who teaches and does experimental work in evolutionary biology, I am astounded that creationism is not taught alongside evolution in most schools. There are several arguments to support such "balanced" curriculum:
If you are a University Prof. who teaches and does experimental work in evolutionary biology, I am astounded...no, I am absolutely stunned, floored, flabergasted, and amazed...that you would make such a statement?
But then you go on to say this:
David Fitch writes:
...For some reason, we are free to bring up Lamarckian transformism as an alternative hypothesis to Darwinian evolution, but shy away from treating intelligent design or special creation as alternative hypotheses....
Which pretty much puts to rest the possibility that you might actually understand evolutionary theory.
™ Version 4.2