In the teaching of evolution we must not forget to integrate the "creation's point of view." For example, evolution says that we descended from the primates, but have we ever seen a present day primate turns into human being?
I don't see why we mustn't forget to integrate the creation's point of view. We don't integrate the flat earth point of view do we? We have never seen a primate that turns into a human being, I don't think that makes any sense to consider. We have seen primates that give birth to humans. My own parents were
primates in fact.
God might have copied the same, did a little modifications on it and created the Australopithecus. Then, copied the same design, modified it, created another, and so on.
The joys of positing an all powerful being is that he coulda done anything. Yes, he could have done that, or he could have created them all at the same time, or created a small group of 'Kinds' which micro evolved. Or perhaps he didn't really create any of them, and we are all angels dreaming of flesh in paradise. Perhaps Bialyabog created spirit and Czernobog created flesh, and the laughing god with the brass moustache steals children if they enter the forest without wearing their clothes backwards before tickling them to death.
In my own understanding, creation and evolution must be taught in a unified approach because they are the same schools of thought viewed like the two sides of a "single coin."
Should we also teach that space and time are absolute? Should we teach that the earth is the centre of the solar system? That rain comes through holes in the heavens? These things are all two sides of the same coin.
My opinion is that creationism should be brought up, to put evolution into historical context. I was taught about creationism and ID as a youngster as ideas that came before evolution. I have no problem with that being brought up, I think it is useful to teach the history of an idea, and what ideas came before it.