They also thought the liftoff of the colombia was a success.
The liftoff of the colombia is what doomed it though.
Science is not music. It is not 'taste'. The standards are a lot stricter than for how music is done.
There is this 'spin off' of science that is called 'psuedo-science'. The practitioners of this use scientific terms, make claim that sounds scientific, and claim evididence that alledges to back up their beliefs.
The evidence does not match what the claims are. The claims all match a predetermined bias on the part of the 'researcher', who does not present the evidence to peer review. It looks oh so scientific to the layman, but it is not. Do you think you can distinguish between the practitioners of psuedoscience from the real thing?
™ Version 4.2
