Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,385 Year: 3,642/9,624 Month: 513/974 Week: 126/276 Day: 23/31 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why are Haeckel's drawings being taught in school?
derwood
Member (Idle past 1896 days)
Posts: 1457
Joined: 12-27-2001


Message 52 of 306 (41106)
05-23-2003 12:38 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by 7
05-15-2003 8:15 PM


Ah - the Icon's list..
Jon Wells is aclassic example of creationist hypocrisy.
He complains that Haeckel's drawings were faked and still being taught, and that the peppered moth photos are staged, and therefore fraudulent.
Have you looked at either of the amazing two Jon Wells' research publications?
Well, I haven't either, except for their abstracts. But in his own research, Wells' removed cytoplasm from Xenopus eggs and teated them with various experimental conditions to see how their development was affected.
Tell us, Z - can any conclusions about nature be drawn from Wells' own research, if we use the "just as it is in nature" criterion that Wells' seems to demand be applied to supporting evolutionary evidence?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by 7, posted 05-15-2003 8:15 PM 7 has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024