Jon Wells is aclassic example of creationist hypocrisy.
He complains that Haeckel's drawings were faked and still being taught, and that the peppered moth photos are staged, and therefore fraudulent.
Have you looked at either of the amazing two Jon Wells' research publications?
Well, I haven't either, except for their abstracts. But in his own research, Wells' removed cytoplasm from
Xenopus eggs and teated them with various experimental conditions to see how their development was affected.
Tell us, Z - can any conclusions about nature be drawn from Wells' own research, if we use the "just as it is in nature" criterion that Wells' seems to demand be applied to supporting evolutionary evidence?