randman,
I didn't read past the first 2 paragraphs and I can see it is probably fruitless to respond to you anymore. You persist in misrepresenting my arguments to create a false straw man to argue with, and that's sad on your part because it prevents a real discussion.
Given that this discussion is about Haeckel's embryo drawings, I don't think asking exactly (with evidence as opposed to your opinion) where the fraud occurs, is misrepresenting anything, nor is logically fallacious. It seems to me to be a perfectly legitimate question, & one that you have failed to answer.
It therefore seems a little hypocritical to be accusing RAZD of being fruitless in discussion.
Mark
There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't