Holmes' little attempts to poke me with sticks, pull my braids, snap my bra strap, or whatever else he thinks he needs to do to get my attention only stir me to the eyerolling stage these days.
But that's not what I am trying to do. I am honestly responding to what you say. I am calling you out for your hypocrisy when I see it, just as you have said you can do (and certainly have done) to people who refuse to acknowledge an open challenge in the past.
Why do you feel that when I do to you EXACTLY what you have done to others, and have defended when they complained, is somehow an immature attempt just to get your attention?
Faith raised this issue a long time ago in a general way and I agreed with her then and still do. People here let those on their own side of the evo issue get away with a lot of garbage. I don't.
I think he's terribly frustrated because he wants me but can't have me.
That's funny because that's the same thing Rrhain said when he couldn't answer my criticisms. What is it that people want to play it off like I am attracted to them in specific when the heat is on? Hmmmm. Take a look at how many posts I made in the last few weeks and figure out how many were to you.
If you want to know the full truth, while you are attractive, and I think you are generally intelligent, I feel no desire to "have you". Indeed given what my sexuality is, how could I be frustrated along those lines? You feel you are damaged goods and I generally react to a person the way they feel about themselves.
You are damaged goods and I don't want you. I do however deserve an answer to an unanswered challenge.
So, he follows me around EvC, trying in the only way he knows how to get my attention.
Might I remind you that this only began after you started replying to me? You replied to me in subjects reasserting old positions which had already been challenged by me and you had left unanswered.
I posted links to info and you simply waved your hand and suggested that science can be misinterpreted data due to bias! That goes to the very question of what you were arguing here with creos.
If it is okay for you, why not for them? If it is not okay for them, then why do you not do what you are asking them to do?... concede on the points I have made against you using citations from valid research.
My view is that holmes deigns to have pity upon all of us poor, unenlightened wretches who don't live just like he does...which is what most of us do.
I have already written many times that while I DO feel my way of life is fantastic, it is personal and subjective. And I DO NOT want everyone to live as I do. I like diversity and if everyone lived and liked things the same way no one would ever get things done, and it would be a lot more boring.
Yes I do pity people who are scares of their own bodies, and the power of their own sexuality. And I have said they have every right to pity me for not feeling as they do. Indeed they do, which is why you are yet again showing your hypocrisy.
EVERYONE is conceited regarding their personal tastes. The difference between people like you and people like me being that I do not reject science and logic when I am discussing issues on subjects which involve my tastes.
Yes you ARE unenlightened, but not regarding your own sexual tastes. They are what they are. You are unenlightened because you don't realize or acknowledge or show any interest in learning where your own beliefs come from in history. You do not challenge your own concepts. That is not conceit on my part, that is a definitional fact.
Of course, he will never actually admit to it.
Most people do not live like I do, and likely will not for a long long long time, if in fact they ever do. That's sort of sad, but as long as there is some community of some kind I don't mind too much. In any case I still wouldn't want everyone living the way I do. That would be more boring.
I've already said this to you so instead of dealing with the evidence you have continued to portray my position using your strawman.
I used to live on a block with the Playboy mansion, a synogue, a catholic cardinal's mansion, and a protestant church. To me that is cool.
I know live in a block filled with prostitutes, sex shops, catholic churches, protestant churches, dope shops, and children's centers. To me that is cool.
Get it through your head, I am not trying to convert you to "my way of life". I am trying to get you to answer challenges to points of fact on history, biology, and psychology which you consistently run away from only to reappear and reassert your position again.
And I "follow" you in the same way you "follow" them. When you see them doing what you do to me, you challenge them and sometimes in even more angry ways. I am doing the same.
Admit you do the same thing and its okay and so have no reason to pester them. Or admit you really are in the wrong and concede on the points outstanding (never to reassert your original errant positions), so that when you hack at creos you are no longer shattering your own windows.
holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)
™ Version 4.2