Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 69 (9033 total)
53 online now:
DrJones*, dwise1, nwr, PaulK, Tangle, Tanypteryx (6 members, 47 visitors)
Newest Member: robertleva
Post Volume: Total: 885,057 Year: 2,703/14,102 Month: 368/703 Week: 21/168 Day: 21/21 Hour: 0/1

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Why Only Creationism So Politicized?
Atapuercan Zusayan 
Inactive Suspended Member

Message 41 of 155 (70058)
11-30-2003 11:13 AM

"Has anyone ever tried to find out why it is only creationism that is so grossly politicized?
Most other pseudosciences are not nearly as politicized."

- but darwinism is politicized.

One does not see astrologers demanding equal time for astrology in astronomy classes, despite the fact that large numbers of people seem to believe in astrology.

And one does not see supporters of various "alternative" medical therapes demanding equal time for their therapies and theories in class presentations on medicine.

- You do not see. We do. Its called Holistic medicine.

Scientologists are not big on demanding that discussions of psychiatry give equal time to Scientology, for example.

- But psychiatry allready covers brainwashing, so there is no need.

It must be noted that the Christian Scientists are an exception;... Christian Scientists have been known to put air conditioners in their churches.

- Scary isnt it.

[This message has been edited by lpetrich, 04-21-2003]

Darwinism is not science, it is political well as us Zusayan folk know it, Philosohpy. Philosophical dialectic-materialism turned dogmatic and as ever unscientific and anti-scientific.
Unlike creationalism which much science supports so it should be recognised by the non-Zusayan barberians.

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by NosyNed, posted 11-30-2003 11:18 AM Atapuercan Zusayan has not yet responded

Atapuercan Zusayan 
Inactive Suspended Member

Message 43 of 155 (70092)
11-30-2003 4:11 PM

11-30-2003 11:13 AM was not ment to be understood as the age of the earth. Honest.

There is no right answer to the age of the earth as it is a darwinian-inspired imposition with no scientific basis.

4600 million - Another presumption by the philosophers of the badlands.

Oinkus Erectus

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by NosyNed, posted 11-30-2003 4:17 PM Atapuercan Zusayan has not yet responded
 Message 48 by mark24, posted 11-30-2003 7:15 PM Atapuercan Zusayan has not yet responded

Atapuercan Zusayan 
Inactive Suspended Member

Message 45 of 155 (70106)
11-30-2003 5:39 PM

Like wise.

So my little badlander, how then can the age of the earth be right - and what is right by your measurement?
Care to elaborate or did I?

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by Adminnemooseus, posted 11-30-2003 7:03 PM Atapuercan Zusayan has not yet responded

Atapuercan Zusayan 
Inactive Suspended Member

Message 153 of 155 (89391)
02-29-2004 9:01 AM
Reply to: Message 124 by NosyNed
12-15-2003 2:05 AM

Re: Back Up
likewise with you lot badlander.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 124 by NosyNed, posted 12-15-2003 2:05 AM NosyNed has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021