Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 62 (9027 total)
43 online now:
AZPaul3 (1 member, 42 visitors)
Newest Member: JustTheFacts
Post Volume: Total: 883,525 Year: 1,171/14,102 Month: 163/411 Week: 59/125 Day: 27/32 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is Intelligent Design Religion in the Guise of Science?
nwr
Member
Posts: 5655
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.8


Message 25 of 204 (445276)
01-01-2008 5:49 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by Organicmachination
01-01-2008 5:40 PM


Re: Branching Off
There is no scientific controversy. The only controversy is religious and/or philosophical. So if we want to teach the philosophycontroversy, that should be done in religious or philosophy classes, not in science classes.

Edited by nwr, : spelling


This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Organicmachination, posted 01-01-2008 5:40 PM Organicmachination has not yet responded

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 5655
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.8


Message 51 of 204 (445496)
01-02-2008 4:47 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by sinequanon
01-02-2008 4:41 PM


Re: Teleological arguments
ID is not science because it does not follow the scientific method.

ID is creationism because its proponents say that it is creationism.

These are two unrelated points.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by sinequanon, posted 01-02-2008 4:41 PM sinequanon has not yet responded

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 5655
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.8


Message 56 of 204 (445507)
01-02-2008 5:21 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by Hyroglyphx
01-02-2008 5:07 PM


Re: And Should it be Taught in Our Schools?
So here is the problem that I see: This systematic suppression of ID is nothing less than coercion.

I haven't seen any evidence of this alleged "systematic suppression". What I have seen are objections to putting it in the science classroom (where it does not belong).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-02-2008 5:07 PM Hyroglyphx has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021