quote:
Originally posted by nos482:
quote:
Originally posted by Tranquility Base:
^ The very point is that most of creationists are not working on C vs E. That is the point. That book is simply a series of testimoneis and the individual should judge it for themselves. It proves nothing except that science PhDed researchers can be YECs in the scores.
Of course they aren't doing any such research since they don't have anything to back up what they are saying. In other words they are living a lie. Their science tells and shows them one thing yet they want to believe the opposite.
**********************
If they are members of the ICR they are explicity prohibited from accepting data that contradict their religious views....that is one major reason why creation science will never be credible...and it should not be called creation SCIENCE rather creation belief. There is no falsifiable or testable hypothesis thus far put forth by ANY creationist so it is therefore not accurately called science.
™ Version 4.2
