Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,820 Year: 4,077/9,624 Month: 948/974 Week: 275/286 Day: 36/46 Hour: 1/7


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   AntiGod education should not be compulsary (even for non wealthy)
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 76 of 281 (83796)
02-06-2004 2:30 AM
Reply to: Message 74 by NosyNed
02-06-2004 2:16 AM


Re: theories and convincing
So the people you mentioned feel calling it a theory graces it too much, and makes one thing it's equal to laws of gravity etc.You then think by referring to the theory at all I must try to show it is a hypothesis. I suppose if I was teaching or something, and someone needed it, perhaps. But in this instance it isn't my point, or job to debate the thing. What is of issue is whether it must be taught or not, to our children.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by NosyNed, posted 02-06-2004 2:16 AM NosyNed has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 83 by NosyNed, posted 02-06-2004 8:56 AM simple has not replied
 Message 94 by Syamsu, posted 02-06-2004 10:33 AM simple has not replied

Rand Al'Thor
Inactive Member


Message 77 of 281 (83797)
02-06-2004 2:31 AM
Reply to: Message 75 by simple
02-06-2004 2:21 AM


Re: plenty
Why do you think it is harmful?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by simple, posted 02-06-2004 2:21 AM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 107 by simple, posted 02-07-2004 1:23 PM Rand Al'Thor has not replied

hitchy
Member (Idle past 5145 days)
Posts: 215
From: Southern Maryland via Pittsburgh
Joined: 01-05-2004


Message 78 of 281 (83800)
02-06-2004 2:46 AM
Reply to: Message 72 by simple
02-06-2004 1:56 AM


Re: theories and convincing
quote:
Now if it was a fact, that would have some bearing!
you are mistaken. a scientific theory is an explanation of several related natural phenomena (facts/empirical observations). so, a theory is an explanation of the facts. it is also falsifiable, testable, and subject to peer review. that is science. since the theory of evolution follows this protocal, it is considered science and is included in a science class, as it should be.
quote:
How would you feel if I forced your children if you had any, or say a neighbor'skids to study marxism, or Buddism, or any such thing?
they do study those things in public school. those topics fall under the social sciences and are found in classes like world history.
quote:
You probably don't feel it is a religion either, many do!
and many people believe that earth is flat! just type flatearthsociety in a search engine. as i have said before, evolution deals with natural phenomena and is inherently areligious. notice i did not say "antireligious" or "atheistic". for it to espouse atheism, evolution would have to take a stance on the supernatural. by definition, science cannot make a supernatural claim and still be science.
quote:
Creation scientists will tell you plenty about the weakness' flaws, hoaxes, assumptions, and so on in the theory.
here is another tid-bit from some creationists. its an oldy, but a goody: a creationist organization in texas lobbied to have the metric system taken out of public schools b/c "jesus had twelve disciples, not ten"!?! that is a big WTF!?!
i handled the rest of what you said in that statement on another thread, i think. or was it this one. i say the same damned things so many times that i forget where i said them. it was recent if you want to check my post history.
quote:
So, back to the topic, I don't want it forced on public schools.
many people on this thread have addressed your topic. we have also provided many rebuttals to your false assertions. as a science teacher, i really don't care if you agree or disagree with evolution. what i do care about are young minds that will some day find a cure for cancer, cure aids, go to the moon, make a funny superbowl ad, run for president, etc...my students acheiving their dreams is my goal. for that, they need a well-rounded education.
you obviously have a limited science background and would rather parrot outmoded, outdated, disproved, or downright false assertions. i have an idea. don't look into the evidences for evolution right away. look at the evidences for creationism and the criticisms of those evidences. then take a look back at evolution. know something about what you profess before you waste any more of our time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by simple, posted 02-06-2004 1:56 AM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 106 by simple, posted 02-07-2004 1:18 PM hitchy has not replied

hitchy
Member (Idle past 5145 days)
Posts: 215
From: Southern Maryland via Pittsburgh
Joined: 01-05-2004


Message 79 of 281 (83801)
02-06-2004 2:53 AM
Reply to: Message 75 by simple
02-06-2004 2:21 AM


one more thing...
quote:
I wouldn't support anyone who teaches it personally, as I believe it is harmful, and wrong. That's my vote.
why do you believe it is harmful and wrong?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by simple, posted 02-06-2004 2:21 AM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 108 by simple, posted 02-07-2004 1:25 PM hitchy has not replied

Andya Primanda
Inactive Member


Message 80 of 281 (83810)
02-06-2004 4:17 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by simple
02-05-2004 11:21 PM


Re: plenty
quote:
And this war won't be in vain,
When we, with Jesus, come
On fierce steeds, to take the earth
From us you shall not hide!
OOO SCARY! THE XTIANS ARE COMING! THE XTIANS ARE COMING!
What kind of religion you have! You talk so much of love yet this is the future for us non-Christians? Trampled by Jesus' army bent on conquiring the world by violence?
Oh well, might as well be ready. Somebody get me bin Laden's phone number please?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by simple, posted 02-05-2004 11:21 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 110 by simple, posted 02-07-2004 1:29 PM Andya Primanda has not replied

Brian
Member (Idle past 4986 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 81 of 281 (83835)
02-06-2004 7:19 AM
Reply to: Message 50 by simple
02-05-2004 11:00 PM


Re: Thinking For Yourself Requires Thinking
Hi.
I am of the opinion that answersingenesis is a website full of garbage written by clueless individuals, so why would exposing these idiots make the world a darker place?
Unless of course you are one of the deluded who think that answersingenesis is a credible site.
If you could actually respond properly to a person's message then it would save all this extra time and effort.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by simple, posted 02-05-2004 11:00 PM simple has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 82 of 281 (83853)
02-06-2004 8:34 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by MrHambre
02-05-2004 12:30 PM


Re: Education Level
quote:
I agree, a mere 67% of grad students responding correctly is disgraceful. Did the other 33% do their post-grad work at Patriot College or something?
Nah, they were all Humanities and Art students.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by MrHambre, posted 02-05-2004 12:30 PM MrHambre has not replied

NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 83 of 281 (83854)
02-06-2004 8:56 AM
Reply to: Message 76 by simple
02-06-2004 2:30 AM


Reasons for not teaching
But in this instance it isn't my point, or job to debate the thing. What is of issue is whether it must be taught or not, to our children
You don't seem to pay attention to what you post do you? The reasons you give for not teaching is that it isn't a valid theory. However, you are incapable of showing that.
Therefore the only reason you have left for not teaching it is that you don't know it yourself and you are of such a weak form of faith that your faith is in danger if scientific ideas are taught. There is no reason for anyone else to listen to you.
Why bother posting if you can't say anything worth listening to.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by simple, posted 02-06-2004 2:30 AM simple has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 84 of 281 (83858)
02-06-2004 9:06 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by simple
02-05-2004 3:34 PM


Re: Better Late Than Never
quote:
May I humbly suggest that since the vast majority of Americans believe in a Creator (Yes Jesus as well, most of them!) That any compulsary education reflect that.
Gee, my Buddhist friends might have a problem with you indoctrinating their children in a religion that they do not follow.
Since there are public schools in neighborhoods where the vast majority of families are non-Christian (for example, on Native American reservations, or in Chinatown areas), don't you think that it would be rather arrogant for the government to dictate what religious indoctrination the children received?
quote:
So, then, pagans and others MINORITIES could pay well to have some private tutorage!
So, you suggest that the US force a certain Christian indoctrination on everyone's children, using everyone's tax money, even the money paid by non-christians? How Facist of you.
quote:
The seperation of church and state, I think is becoming obvious now, that the (mostly Christian) founders had in mind was more of a -let's not have one denomination, or church control the whole thing-.
As the great Cthulu said, most of our Founding Fathers were Deist, not Christian.
quote:
Not that the -nation under God- should force paganistic theory and doctrine on helpless children.
Such as?
(Please provide your definition of "Paganistic theory")

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by simple, posted 02-05-2004 3:34 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 111 by simple, posted 02-07-2004 1:33 PM nator has replied

Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3976
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 85 of 281 (83859)
02-06-2004 9:08 AM


One good thing
I note that 14gipper has confined his/her posting to just this topic. I think as long as that continues, I can tolerate 14.
Might I suggest that the evo side take a break, and give 14gipper a big piece of room to make a more major statement on the whys etc. of his/her position?
Cheers,
Larger font Adminnemooseus

Comments on moderation procedures? - Go to
Change in Moderation?
or
too fast closure of threads

Replies to this message:
 Message 86 by NosyNed, posted 02-06-2004 9:09 AM Adminnemooseus has replied

NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 86 of 281 (83861)
02-06-2004 9:09 AM
Reply to: Message 85 by Adminnemooseus
02-06-2004 9:08 AM


Re: One good thing
Ok, taking a break. Will I get some hint as to when it would be ok to start up again?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by Adminnemooseus, posted 02-06-2004 9:08 AM Adminnemooseus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 90 by Adminnemooseus, posted 02-06-2004 9:40 AM NosyNed has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 87 of 281 (83866)
02-06-2004 9:20 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by simple
02-05-2004 10:57 PM


Re: MOSTLY CHRISTIAN?!
quote:
Founders, I think were mostly Christian, I don't know about 'fathers' you could be right, I've heard both. Nevertheless, the fact stands Christians they were. If they weren't it was so predominent a lot of folks would pretend to be.
No, the "fact" doesn't stand that they were all Christians, as you have claimed.
Quartz Hill School of Theology

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by simple, posted 02-05-2004 10:57 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 112 by simple, posted 02-07-2004 1:36 PM nator has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 88 of 281 (83869)
02-06-2004 9:23 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by simple
02-05-2004 11:08 PM


Re: plenty
quote:
The problem is not in belief but in unbelief here. Stick to the facts in all sciences, none of which include evolution at all.
Can you please provide your understanding of what evolution is and how it works?
Just want to check that you are not harboring any misconceptions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by simple, posted 02-05-2004 11:08 PM simple has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 89 of 281 (83871)
02-06-2004 9:39 AM
Reply to: Message 60 by simple
02-06-2004 1:02 AM


Re: plenty
quote:
Sometimes He works that way, other times He don't.
"Doesn't."
"...Other times he doesn't" is the correct grammar, not "...other times he don't.
quote:
However He works I don't want kid's subjected to your madness you call science, thinking it tell you things. Like it or not.
You need a comma after "works", and the correct way to make a word plural is to just add an 's'; using the apostrophe 's' makes it a posessive.
Oh, you also misspelled "compulsory" in the title of this topic.
I don't normally pick on spelling and grammar errors because we all make them from time to time, but I just couldn't resist pointing out the numerous examples you made in the light of your blanket criticisms of science.
Tell me again why I want to take your advice on how we should educate children?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by simple, posted 02-06-2004 1:02 AM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 91 by mike the wiz, posted 02-06-2004 9:43 AM nator has replied
 Message 113 by simple, posted 02-07-2004 1:41 PM nator has replied

Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3976
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 90 of 281 (83873)
02-06-2004 9:40 AM
Reply to: Message 86 by NosyNed
02-06-2004 9:09 AM


Re: One good thing
The intent, was a suggestion, not a SUGGESTION.
That said, I suggest all note the Admin Percy message at http://EvC Forum: Fossil sorting for simple
Things are looking that I'm going to be away from the 'puter for quite a while today, so use your own judgement, and don't wait for the green light.
AM

Comments on moderation procedures? - Go to
Change in Moderation?
or
too fast closure of threads

This message is a reply to:
 Message 86 by NosyNed, posted 02-06-2004 9:09 AM NosyNed has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024