Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 79 (8961 total)
329 online now:
caffeine, PaulK, Taq (3 members, 326 visitors)
Newest Member: Mikee
Post Volume: Total: 869,405 Year: 1,153/23,288 Month: 1,153/1,851 Week: 277/320 Day: 49/87 Hour: 4/17

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Which religion's creation story should be taught?
Inactive Member

Message 13 of 331 (115582)
06-16-2004 12:55 AM

I have yet to see real science support the belief of a religon besides the Bible. Creationists show how fossils, young earth, natural selection, complexity, flood evidence, dinasaurs, design, uniqueness of the Bible & Jesus etc are all consistent with the Bible. If there is Muslim or Hindu qualified scientist doing this also then they should have a right to teach scientific creation.

This message has been edited by almeyda, 06-15-2004 11:56 PM

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by arachnophilia, posted 06-16-2004 3:09 AM almeyda has not yet responded
 Message 15 by NosyNed, posted 06-16-2004 3:46 AM almeyda has not yet responded
 Message 18 by Steen, posted 06-30-2004 1:43 AM almeyda has responded

Inactive Member

Message 19 of 331 (121736)
07-04-2004 1:20 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by Steen
06-30-2004 1:43 AM

Actually, REAL science disagrees with much of the Bible, and certainly with the literal reading of Genesis 1.
Anyway, if you want scientific description of how we got here, then you would have to use science, rather than ANY religion. If you want to use religion, then you are not using science, and therefore it doesn't matter how scientifically aligned the stories are; the only thing that matters is whether they are religious or not.

Actually, no science disagrees with the Bible, only evolution which is a theory on how things have came to be through natural processes without a designer. Creation is the science of a religion, We can use real science to see if our Bible relates to the facts of reality and is consistent with the facts of reality.

Given that there are no qualigfied creationist scientists doing so either, your argument essentially is that creationists shouldn't be allowed to teach either. Hmm...

Ahh yes the old creationists are not scientist argument. Have a quick check of this link and then tell me there are no real scientist who believe in creation. Creationism has been pushed away from mainstream science as it deals with a designer. A bias has arisen since Darwin which is strictly naturalism. Therefore anything about a designer is considered supernatural and not science. This is a biasness, not a take on what science is and what science isnt.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Steen, posted 06-30-2004 1:43 AM Steen has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by crashfrog, posted 07-04-2004 6:24 AM almeyda has not yet responded
 Message 21 by Steen, posted 07-04-2004 6:32 PM almeyda has not yet responded
 Message 24 by RAZD, posted 07-04-2004 11:46 PM almeyda has not yet responded
 Message 26 by arachnophilia, posted 07-05-2004 4:15 AM almeyda has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020