Key points of Evolution

We should not confuse the fact of evolution with the theories about how it exactly came about. To establish that evolution took place "one way or the other", it is irrelevant how much time was available or what we know about mechanisms. The observation that different organisms share parts of the genetic code, even non-functional parts, in a pattern that matches heredity (plus other observations concerning morphology etc) is enough in itself to infer common descent/evolution. Only when you start to speculate about the mechanism, and consider mutations and natural selection, it becomes useful to have evidence for timeframes in the order of magnitude of millions/billions of years in order to make the numbers match up. You are quite mistaken. Maybe it's time to visit The scientific case for common descent, so you can decide for yourself; fact is that some of the evidence will only make the slightest sense if you "view it through evolution-colored glasses". Any other glasses will give you a collection of meaningless trivia.

Wumpini,did you ever check out 29+ Evidences for Macroevolution?This is highly recommended before you continue "discussing" the ("lack of..")evidence for evolution, because it will save you and us a lot of time.

Wumpini,you have to understand that some people here get fed up easily with the many new posters who clearly lack a lot of information, but still go around shouting how there "is no evidence", how there "is great disagreement between scientists" etc. etc. Instead of showing a bit of humility, and at least covering the criticism up as honest questions.Not that I'm targeting you specifically here. It's just that having many like those around, has conditioned some regulars into responding in a certain tone. ;-)