Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9077 total)
665 online now:
PaulK, Percy (Admin), Phat (3 members, 662 visitors)
Newest Member: Contrarian
Post Volume: Total: 894,014 Year: 5,126/6,534 Month: 546/794 Week: 37/135 Day: 14/23 Hour: 0/3

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Does Evolution Require Spreading The Word?
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 504
From: Juneau, Alaska, USA
Joined: 03-22-2004

Message 57 of 135 (336132)
07-28-2006 5:26 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by Modulous
07-28-2006 3:34 PM

Re: It's not science, imo

As you are no doubt very aware this is standard debate format with some around here. Criticize papers and works they have never read and will never read because is is hard. As long as the ToE remains a vague, distant unknown it is easy to pick apart, heaven help us if we actually have to argue the truth.

With a high level of ignorance it is easy to label the whole system a belief, a religion. Once labelled as such any discussion about it becomes evangelical.

Also, I have composed a new topic to discuss landmark works in the ToE, but as it was your idea wanted to ask if it was okay before I post it.

Doctor Bashir: "Of all the stories you told me, which were true and which weren't?"
Elim Garak: "My dear Doctor, they're all true"
Doctor Bashir: "Even the lies?"
Elim Garak: "Especially the lies"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Modulous, posted 07-28-2006 3:34 PM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by Modulous, posted 07-29-2006 1:15 AM Lithodid-Man has taken no action

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022