I maintain that it's not difficult to see what ID is about.
So then it should be quite easy to provide a testable hypothesis, correct?
The real questions are
1.) Why are evolutionists terrified of ID?
2.) Why can't they tackle the real ID instead of misportraying it?
1- I prefer evidence.
2- Its a slippery little sucker, care to provide a hypothesis so it can be tackled?
Magic number is all yours - end the thread with a hypothesis.