Humans walked with dinosaurs

It would upset our understanding of human evolution.However, there are not problems there. The 'paulxy river' footprints are not human footprints at all. they are mostly a different kind of dinosaur (and not even going in the proper direction, and some are modern forgies. The "Creation Evidence Museusm" is run by a Carl Baugh, who has made many outragous and fraudulant claims, inclding
have a 'fossilzed' human finger, and all sorts of nonsense.The personw who runs the museum , although he claims to have a PHD, is a Baptist minister who went to an non-accreditied university.

Why do you find Talk origins 'less than credible'. They document their sources very well, including links to peer reviewed scientific journals.Could it be that you don't want to accept their viewpoint?Since you claim they are 'less than credible', perhaps you can point out a specific incident, and we can analyse if they are 'less than credible' or not?

If you saw the one link, they have found that a number of the tracks were made by man, carving them. These tracks were sold for souvineers in the 20's and 30's.Fakes made for the tourist trade don't really count for evidence , does it?

Supposedly, a number of 'fake' footprints were made for the tourist trade in the 1920's and 1930's. You will notice that is it not part of the original bed of rock, but removed from the original scene. That is so they could sell them in souvenier shops.

I do not think you will be waiting a long time for any kind of reasonable answer.Basically, randman thinks Talk origins is unreliable because the YEC sites he puts his trust in say they aren't.

Hum. What is a whole bunch of logical fallacies with misinformation and lies have to do with 'humans walked with dinosaurs'?I mean, the misinformation in that one page is astounding.