Well actually, the links in the OP apparently deal with finds besides the Paluxy river tracks, or on skimming it, I notice they first feature tracks of normal size footprints, not the oversize ones you guys seem familiar with.
It would be another thread and too much time to get into now, but there is often a level of illogic and distortion in the articles I have read that basically places it, imo, in the arena of propaganda.
I guess if you think propaganda is good science, maybe so....but if you don't like indoctrination technigues such as using the term "evolution" in different ways, insisting because one definition is true that the other is as well, a logical fallacy, and the many other errors and fallaciousness you can find there, well, if you cannot see it, I suggest you put your thinking cap back on.
No, I demonstrated it amply. No objective person that is educated in indoctrination and propaganda technigues could fail to see what I wrote is true. To hear someone like yourself say "you failed to support" means nothing. If you were taught the sky was orange, and I produced photos of it being blue, it wouldn't change your opinion. You'd still say the same thing. There are no facts, logic, etc,...that can affect you as you cling to what appears to me to be a religiously held beleif.
You said nothing nice, and just spouted a bunch of crap about another thread, and are now whining about it in a juvenile fashion. Bottom line is I amply showed on that thread the distortion, illogic, etc,...of TO evo arguments. You guys don't see it?