Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9046 total)
509 online now:
jar, kjsimons, Parasomnium, Tangle (4 members, 505 visitors)
Newest Member: Dade
Post Volume: Total: 887,304 Year: 4,950/14,102 Month: 548/707 Week: 103/176 Day: 12/20 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Embarrassed Creationist
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 459 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 4 of 69 (188334)
02-25-2005 2:01 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Vercingetorix
02-23-2005 2:21 PM


If I personally am going to pick a side and use faith, my faith goes to God a creationism.

Here's a radical idea: Side with both your faith and the evidence, and go with God and evolution. Why, after all, are they incompatible?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Vercingetorix, posted 02-23-2005 2:21 PM Vercingetorix has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by coffee_addict, posted 02-25-2005 2:50 AM crashfrog has not yet responded

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 459 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 22 of 69 (188489)
02-25-2005 11:40 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by Vercingetorix
02-25-2005 9:52 AM


C-Frog and R-Hector both talk about EVIDENCE. evidence leads to proof and there fore DOES PROVE, Science Proves.

On what planet? Evidence can never lead to proof. You can never prove by inference, only by deduction. And science is not a deductive process, because the axiomatic conditions are not avaliable to us.

TOE is more likely, but until proven, still wrong.

How does that make any sense? Because we don't know everything, we know nothing?

FAITH, has no place in SCIENCE!

Of course not. We have evidence, instead.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Vercingetorix, posted 02-25-2005 9:52 AM Vercingetorix has not yet responded

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 459 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 58 of 69 (596151)
12-13-2010 1:20 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by BarackZero
12-13-2010 1:05 PM


One more PRATTfall
Why don't you look up the Cambrian Explosion.

Why don't you look it up?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambrian_explosion

Here's a quick question to test your comprehension - how many different species are represented by "Cambrian Explosion" fossils? Be specific.

quote:
The presence of Precambrian animals somewhat dampens the "bang" of the explosion: not only was the appearance of animals gradual, but their evolutionary radiation ("diversification") may also not have been as rapid as once thought. Indeed, statistical analysis shows that the Cambrian explosion was no faster than any of the other radiations in animals' history.

One of the most enduring of frauds was Haeckel's drawings.

http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB701.html

Edited by crashfrog, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by BarackZero, posted 12-13-2010 1:05 PM BarackZero has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021