Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 85 (8936 total)
30 online now:
GDR, jar, Percy (Admin), ssope, Taq (5 members, 25 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: ssope
Upcoming Birthdays: AdminPhat
Post Volume: Total: 861,637 Year: 16,673/19,786 Month: 798/2,598 Week: 44/251 Day: 21/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Embarrassed Creationist
Taq
Member
Posts: 8000
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 4.3


Message 63 of 69 (596180)
12-13-2010 5:16 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by BarackZero
12-13-2010 1:00 PM


Re: Topic?
You do realize that the post was still carried on this brilliant forum, don't you?

You do realize that there is an opening post and your posts are suposed to be related to it?

From the OP:

quote:
1. I do not think that either side of the issue has definate 100% proof, and reguardless on what side of the fence you are on requires some ever so small amount of faith in your side of the arguement. even if it is just faith that science will find the answer and is on the right path. If I personally am going to pick a side and use faith, my faith goes to God a creationism. I could be wrong (it happens multiple times daily), and then I would have to switch sides.

2. The other probable reason for me is that I am not a positivist. Positivism is not the only philosophy out there when it comes to reasearch, and I believe Positivism is esentially flawed (because it relies on observation and objectivity).


Do you have any comments on this?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by BarackZero, posted 12-13-2010 1:00 PM BarackZero has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019