2 online now:	Minnemooseus (Adminnemooseus), Phat
Newest Member:	ChatGPT
Post Volume:	Total: 916,784 Year: 4,041/9,624 Month: 912/974 Week: 239/286 Day: 0/46 Hour: 0/0

EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Education and Creation/Evolution ⇒

Dover science teachers refuse to read ID disclaimer

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: Dover science teachers refuse to read ID disclaimer

Adminnemooseus

Administrator

Posts: 3976

Joined: 09-26-2002

Normal Thread Display

Message 121 of 164 (271115)
12-20-2005 12:43 PM

Reply to: Message 120 by Clark
12-20-2005 11:42 AM

Re: Big Win - Should have a reference for that quote

As is, it is totally unatributed.

Source, and link to source? Please add by edit to your message.

Please, no replies to this message.

Adminnemooseus

{Edited to change ID}

This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 12-20-2005 12:46 PM

This message is a reply to:
	Message 120 by Clark, posted 12-20-2005 11:42 AM		Clark has not replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 122 by PaulK, posted 12-20-2005 12:53 PM		Adminnemooseus has not replied

Adminnemooseus

Administrator

Posts: 3976

Joined: 09-26-2002

Normal Thread Display

Message 139 of 164 (271400)
12-21-2005 12:05 PM

Reply to: Message 136 by custard
12-21-2005 7:54 AM

Peer review is off-topic, but there are existing topics

The State of Peer Review

most scientific papers are wrong?

A good theme to pursue further.

I suspect that the second topic might directly relate to your NY Times article. But the first topic still might be the better place to pursue the matter. Take your pick.

Adminnemooseus

New Members should start HERE to get an understanding of what makes great posts.

Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
General discussion of moderation procedures
Thread Reopen Requests
Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum