Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,804 Year: 4,061/9,624 Month: 932/974 Week: 259/286 Day: 20/46 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   should creationism be taught in schools?
mramos13
Inactive Member


Message 63 of 301 (281618)
01-25-2006 11:47 PM
Reply to: Message 62 by a1robbie
01-25-2006 1:43 AM


While I agree that creationism should not be taught in schools, I think it's necessary to look at it from merely a scientific point of view. Creationism and ID are not science and have no place being taught in a science classroom. However, when you try to incorporate an element of fairness,in saying it would not be appropriate for people to have to hear about creation if they don't believe in it, the same can be said of students now who are hearing about evolution and not believing in it. Isn't it unfair for them?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by a1robbie, posted 01-25-2006 1:43 AM a1robbie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by jar, posted 01-25-2006 11:54 PM mramos13 has replied
 Message 69 by a1robbie, posted 01-26-2006 7:50 PM mramos13 has not replied
 Message 77 by Jon, posted 01-31-2006 1:22 PM mramos13 has not replied

mramos13
Inactive Member


Message 66 of 301 (281623)
01-26-2006 12:03 AM
Reply to: Message 64 by jar
01-25-2006 11:54 PM


It would be unfair to teach that 2+2=5 because we know it is not true. No one would argue a set of beliefs to tell you it's not. Some things are facts and other beliefs. In the school system we teach what we know to be facts based on observed evidence and knowledge. In this sense it would be unfair to teach anyone something we knew not to be correct. Applying this to beliefs is much harder. I would agree that the different idea needs to be said so that this person would have the opportunity to decide what they believe in (or which number they chose to be the correct answer to 2+2). In a public school though, they should be exposed to this idea in a philosophy or religion class. Not science.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by jar, posted 01-25-2006 11:54 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by jar, posted 01-26-2006 12:13 AM mramos13 has replied
 Message 74 by babelfish, posted 01-27-2006 2:14 PM mramos13 has not replied

mramos13
Inactive Member


Message 68 of 301 (281625)
01-26-2006 12:21 AM
Reply to: Message 67 by jar
01-26-2006 12:13 AM


Re: creationism in philosophy class?
I take the definition of philosophy to be the critical analysis of fundamental assumptions or beliefs. Philosophy would seek to understand why people believe the things they do, it would not seek to prove what is right and what is wrong. Because despite these facts, you would be unable to convince everyone of the truth in evolution. They have a stronghold in beliefs that you would be unable to alter. This is why I suggested philosophy. Simply to gain more knowledge on peoples beliefs, not to discuss that they are wrong.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by jar, posted 01-26-2006 12:13 AM jar has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024