Well then, why would the scientists' construction of the genetic tree of life fit so perfectly well with the morphological tree of life without any contradiction. By mathematical probability and statistically, there surely should have been some type of contradictions or conflicts between the morphological tree of life and the genetic one.
They don't fit "without any contradiction." There is even a recent case where some nasty-looking little sea creature that was thought to be a mullosc, I think it was, but turns out on the basis of DNA to be more like an acorn worm or suchlike, and possibly a new phylum of its own. Bats have turned out to belong to two seperate Classes instead of one, as morphology once had it figured. So no, the fit isn't perfect. But of course, the surprises are what make news, and the "we already knew that"s don't.