Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   July, 2003, Posts of the Month
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 3 of 33 (45195)
07-06-2003 1:37 AM


Name: Salty
Forum: Evolution
Thread: The Nature of Mutations II
Post #: 94
quote:
I doubt if the less than 1% difference between chimp and human DNA has anything to do with our drastically different phenotypes. It is far more likely that the structural chromosomal differences serve to modify the rate and timing of critical developmental transformations much as Goldschmidt predicted 64 years ago. I would also regard a structural chromosomal change as a mutation whether or not it involved a base pair substitution. salty
Maybe this item has already been debated into the ground before (I really have trouble following the heavy genetics topics), but I, very much not a biologist, did find this as something perhaps worth persuing. Are there at least some valid posibilities here?
Remember, do any discussion at the source topic, not in this topic. Or maybe it belongs in a different topic.
Cheers,
Moose

Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 5 of 33 (45318)
07-07-2003 2:46 PM


Name: MrHambre
Forum: Intelligent Design
Thread: Design With No Designer
Number: 17
Name: MrHambre
Forum: Intelligent Design
Thread: intelligent design, right and wrong
Number: 103
An intelligent design double header from earlier today - No further comment.
Moose

Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 11 of 33 (45562)
07-09-2003 9:36 PM


Social Darwinism
Name: Wounded King
Forum: Free For All
Thread: Syamsu's Objection to Natural Selection...
Number: 26
Comments on social Darwinism. Probably has been said before elsewhere, but here's a current version.
Moose

Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 24 of 33 (46597)
07-20-2003 7:07 PM


Name: holmes
Forum: Intelligent Design
Thread: A thought on Intelligence behind Design
Post #: 171
quote:
For example, there was the artist who engineered a rabbit that glowed. Let's say he never announced his project and simply set the animal free. And it mated and that trait became inherited and no one noticed these glowing rabbits until there was a small population already established.
See the original message for the greater context.
In general, I continue to be a big fan of holmes. It seems I depend on him to make sense of the statements of the more "wacked out"* philosophers around here.
* - meaning that their logic may or may not be valid, but it's certainly beyond my comprehension.
Moose

Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 30 of 33 (47496)
07-25-2003 10:48 PM


Name: Brian Johnston
Forum: Faith and Belief
Thread: do you really Believe we are damned?
Post #: 27
Brian's Christian goats and Christian sheep story, complete with the Mother Teresa example.
Moose

Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 33 of 33 (48638)
08-04-2003 2:58 PM


Name: MrHambre, Barryven, MrHambre
Forum: Intelligent Design
Thread: A thought on Intelligence behind design
Post #: 200, 202, and 203
More or less, a discussion on a less than omnipotent designer.
Moose

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024