What's the creationists thought on this?

quote:

---

As for the evolutionists, Dr. Gentry is one of the most brilliant creationists I have ever read about...

---

Now THAT'S a frightening thought...

quote:

---

...he has done overwhelming research on radio-polonium halos in a prevailing attempt to prove that the earth was never a ‘hot molten mass’ the way evolutionists believe it started.

---

Nonsense. Gentry has found and described what appear to be Po decay haloes, but it means nothing as far as the age of the rocks they are found in. For instance, why are some of these granites found cross-cutting older rocks?

quote:

---

Also, there is no way of knowing that the geologic column (that many seem to worship)

---

Please document this.

quote:

---

...is a truthful scenario. Get Brian Young’s book entitled Doubts About Creation? and you’ll see plenty of examples why the geologic column is phony. As for here; many of the layers are overlapping ... and you’ll notice that many of the layers, which are supposed to represent thousands or even millions of years, are overlapping, which indicate they are in fact the same age).

---

Please explain why overlapping rocks must be of the same age. I have stacks of paper on my desk. They overlap. And yet some were placed there days after others...

quote:

---

Also, I’m still waiting on WHY the polystrate fossils as I have seen in Joggins Nova Scotia and Oregon are NOT ample proof of the flood (or at least evidence against the geologic column).

---

Nonsense. Even though thick beds can be deposited quickly, that has nothing at all to do with the overall rate of sedimentation.