... my question is why would you proclaim my ignorance when others here express similar sentiments???
Non-responsive: Please list and defend a couple of reasons to believe that carbon dating is inaccurate for more than a few percentage point at establishing absolute dates.
Is it more acceptable coming from a fellow evolutionist or something?
As well as being insulting to the integrity of others, it wastes bandwidth and gets us no closer to an answer.
BeagleBob's statement does not say that carbon dating is unreliable” your assertion ” only that U-Pb has built-in double checks and that carbon dating has more sources for possible error than U-Pb dating. That this is acknowledged means possible source of error can be taken into account, restoring accuracy.
Claiming that RC dating is unreliable is like saying pacing off a distance is more prone to error than tape measure so the results of pacing could be off by orders of magnitude.
Don't do that Dave.