Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,784 Year: 4,041/9,624 Month: 912/974 Week: 239/286 Day: 0/46 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Buz's refutation of all radiometric dating methods
tomwillrep
Inactive Member


Message 6 of 269 (43607)
06-22-2003 9:53 AM


why is it that if a scientific theory is wrong its always a "mistake" or thrown right out the door and new ways brought in?
anyway, have other tests been undertaken on the lava and have they been made public?!
thanks

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by John, posted 06-22-2003 11:06 AM tomwillrep has not replied
 Message 13 by Buzsaw, posted 06-22-2003 11:36 PM tomwillrep has not replied

  
tomwillrep
Inactive Member


Message 8 of 269 (43615)
06-22-2003 11:18 AM


if your argument is correct please shwo me a source made BEFORE the tests were taken stating that they knew the dating method would not work- if they stated that afterwards then i would be very suspicious.
thanks

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by edge, posted 06-22-2003 9:36 PM tomwillrep has not replied
 Message 27 by Rrhain, posted 06-24-2003 8:20 AM tomwillrep has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024