Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Dates and Dating ⇒

Feedback about reliability of dating

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Feedback about reliability of dating
anglagard
Member (Idle past 858 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006

Normal Thread Display
Message 34 of 77 (365899)
11-25-2006 12:46 AM 		Reply to: Message 33 by Confidence
11-24-2006 11:57 PM

Re: Lesson to be learned
Confidence states:
​
You are talking as if no creationists can be scientists. This in itself is ignorant and lends discredit to your position as an evolutionist. For there are plenty of scientists who are creationists.
​
According to Newsweek via Religioustolerance.org at Beliefs of the U.S. public about evolution and creation
​
quote:
According to Newsweek in 1987, "By one count there are some 700 scientists with respectable academic credentials (out of a total of 480,000 U.S. earth and life scientists) who give credence to creation-science..." That would make the support for creation science among those branches of science who deal with the earth and its life forms at about 0.14%
​
Evidently it all depends upon one's definition of "plenty."
​
And their "work" is of no less value than a scientists with an evolutionary stand.
​
Evidently not, according to 99.86% of all scientists that work directly with 'creation science' evidence.
​
Both have the same evidence at hand, but their interpretations differ due to their different presuppositions.
​
No, they have the same data. Before such data becomes evidence, it must be interpreted according to a rational framework. The real debate is if your framework is logically derived, or built upon obvious misinterpretations and intentional falsehoods.
​
ABE - Oh, almost forgot, welcome to EvC
​
Edited by anglagard, : No reason given.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Confidence, posted 11-24-2006 11:57 PM Confidence has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024