Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Feedback about reliability of dating
EighteenDelta
Inactive Member


Message 74 of 77 (433394)
11-11-2007 5:48 PM
Reply to: Message 73 by jsaunders327
11-11-2007 5:36 PM


Re: Decay rates are constant
So why should we believe that decay rates have changed? You do realize that the decay rates aren't random, but dictated by the laws of physics? Is it only because the decay rates prove that your dates and time lines are grossly erroneous? Is that the reason you are so desperate to convince yourself and us that these methods are unreliable?
-x

"Debate is an art form. It is about the winning of arguments. It is not about the discovery of truth. There are certain rules and procedures to debate that really have nothing to do with establishing fact ” which creationists have mastered. Some of those rules are: never say anything positive about your own position because it can be attacked, but chip away at what appear to be the weaknesses in your opponent's position. They are good at that. I don't think I could beat the creationists at debate. I can tie them. But in courtrooms they are terrible, because in courtrooms you cannot give speeches. In a courtroom you have to answer direct questions about the positive status of your belief. We destroyed them in Arkansas. On the second day of the two-week trial we had our victory party!"
-Stephen Jay Gould

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by jsaunders327, posted 11-11-2007 5:36 PM jsaunders327 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024