Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 76 (8908 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 05-19-2019 4:17 PM
27 online now:
kjsimons, marc9000, PaulK (3 members, 24 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: WeloTemo
Upcoming Birthdays: Percy
Post Volume:
Total: 851,610 Year: 6,647/19,786 Month: 1,188/1,581 Week: 10/393 Day: 10/30 Hour: 0/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Is Radiometric Dating Really that Accurate?
Aryeh Shavit
Inactive Member

Message 34 of 114 (27828)
12-25-2002 3:44 AM
Reply to: Message 33 by Brad McFall
10-05-2002 2:55 PM

Hi all,

When I read YEC articles (and some posts here) about the radiometry, I canít help feeling I read another conspiracy theory.

Indeed, if the radiometry (which exists from the days of Rutherford) is that provably incorrect, then what, except from a worldwide conspiracy, can explain its wide usage?

I am a computer scientist and sometimes I notice a lot of stupid and baseless assumptions in my field, but there is little doubt that the majority of the computer scientists know what they are doing. I have no reason to assume that the situation is dramatically different in other sciences. Unless there is a worldwide conspiracy of the Satan-driven evolutionists against the Bible.

So I would like to ask those who claim the radiometry methods are incorrect, what is their explanation of the situation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Brad McFall, posted 10-05-2002 2:55 PM Brad McFall has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by mark24, posted 12-31-2002 10:43 AM Aryeh Shavit has not yet responded
 Message 41 by Brad McFall, posted 01-02-2003 12:50 AM Aryeh Shavit has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019