Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9161 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,583 Year: 2,840/9,624 Month: 685/1,588 Week: 91/229 Day: 2/61 Hour: 2/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Age Correlations and an Old Earth: Version 1 No 3 (formerly Part III)
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1334 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 14 of 357 (320506)
06-11-2006 1:03 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by RAZD
06-11-2006 12:26 PM


Re: Young earth, it's bogus
As noted by others this "evidence" of yours is another PRATT.
not JUST a pratt, a hovind pratt.
How Good are those Young-Earth Arguments: Hovind's 'Proofs'
quote:
Should creationists then continue to use the moon dust as apparent evidence for a young moon, earth and solar system? Clearly, the answer is no. The weight of the evidence as it currently exists shows no inconsistency within the evolutionists’ case, so the burden of proof is squarely on creationists if they want to argue that based on the meteoritic dust the moon is young. Thus it is inexcusable for one creationist writer to recently repeat verbatim an article of his published five years earlier,229,230 maintaining that the meteoritic dust is proof that the moon is young in the face of the overwhelming evidence against his arguments.
Moon Dust and the Age of the Solar System | Answers in Genesis


This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by RAZD, posted 06-11-2006 12:26 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by RAZD, posted 06-11-2006 7:15 PM arachnophilia has not replied
 Message 133 by Casey Powell, posted 01-03-2007 6:11 PM arachnophilia has replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1334 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 148 of 357 (374293)
01-04-2007 12:32 AM
Reply to: Message 133 by Casey Powell
01-03-2007 6:11 PM


Re: Young earth, it's bogus
We have salt in the seas, the Earth's magnetic field, Comets, and Aging the Solar System, the Kuiper Belt, the Oort comet cloud problems for Evolutionists, Saturns Rings, Mercury (the tiny planet that causes big problems for Emo Evos), The speedy star changes, exploding stars, extrasolar planets, venus, Helium, a steady sun, solar neutrinos, Dendrochronological failures, eroding ages, plutons and their rapid cooling, microscopic diamonds, rapid granite formation, rapid rocks, sandy stripes, instant petrified wood, rapid petrification of wood, limestone caves, stalactite rapidity, Forests growing on water, rapid ice building, etc.!
yes, those are all good examples of other hovind pratts. thank you for contributing.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 133 by Casey Powell, posted 01-03-2007 6:11 PM Casey Powell has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 151 by Casey Powell, posted 01-04-2007 3:32 PM arachnophilia has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024