Understanding through Discussion

QuickSearch

 EvC Forum active members: 52 (9184 total)
 2 online now: Newest Member: paulwilliam Post Volume: Total: 918,430 Year: 5,687/9,624 Month: 93/619 Week: 26/56 Day: 1/11 Hour: 1/0

EvC Forum Science Forums Dates and Dating

# Age Correlations and an Old Earth: Version 1 No 3 (formerly Part III)

Author Topic:   Age Correlations and an Old Earth: Version 1 No 3 (formerly Part III)
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3782 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005

 Message 318 of 357 (503016) 03-15-2009 10:30 AM Reply to: Message 317 by Daniel414003-15-2009 10:20 AM

Re: Use evidence I can agree with
4. Give the odds of this happening by accident. The odds of a 7th year being correct by accident are 1/7 and a Jubilee 1/49.
5. Multiply them out 1/7 * 1/7 * 1/49 .... etc, and you arrive at the figure of 1 < 10^50 probability of chance.
So if this is all true, you have demonstrated that the chronology you have constructed is internally consistent? Well done. You do know that consistent bullshit is still, well, bullshit?
That's my proof that treering and ice core "chronologies" are bogus.
Yes, I'm quite sure it is

 This message is a reply to: Message 317 by Daniel4140, posted 03-15-2009 10:20 AM Daniel4140 has replied

 Replies to this message: Message 322 by Daniel4140, posted 03-15-2009 4:11 PM cavediver has replied

cavediver
Member (Idle past 3782 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005

 Message 327 of 357 (503044) 03-15-2009 4:56 PM Reply to: Message 322 by Daniel414003-15-2009 4:11 PM

Re: Use evidence I can agree with
The raw data for the chronology comes from the BIBLE. I have to take it as I find it. I can't change it to fit the cycles.
Yes, but these cycles come from the Bible!!! Even assuming you have done all that you say you have done in identifying these sabbatical and jubilee years, all you have done is shown the Bible is at least consistent in its own chronology. SO F'ING WHAT? Even if true (which we seriously doubt) then it is merely interesting. It demonstrates that the varied authors of the Old Testament managed to get their dates in order. Your probablity calculations are irrelevant meaningless nonsense.
Further, I also have some paper's on my site citing the synchronization of the cycles with the Kondratieff waves.
how can you synchronise against something that has no definite time period???
Did you ever hear of the "Pinching Theorem" in Calculus?
I'm a professional mathematician - the pinching theorem is used for determining limits of functions. This has NOTHING to do with any of your research, tree ring dates, and ice cores. All it shows is you are just one more internet crank with no clue...

 This message is a reply to: Message 322 by Daniel4140, posted 03-15-2009 4:11 PM Daniel4140 has not replied

 Date format: mm-dd-yyyy Timezone: ET (US)
 Newer Topic | Older Topic Jump to:Board Administration     The Public Record     Announcements     Proposed New Topics     Suggestions and Questions Science Forums     The Bible: Accuracy and Inerrancy     Big Bang and Cosmology     Dates and Dating     Education and Creation/Evolution     Biological Evolution     Geology and the Great Flood     Human Origins and Evolution     Intelligent Design     Is It Science?     Creation/Evolution Miscellany     Origin of Life Social and Religious Issues     Bible Study     Comparative Religions     Social Issues and Creation/Evolution     Faith and Belief     Theological Creationism and ID Side Orders     Coffee House     The Great Debate     Free For All     Post of the Month     Links and Information     Creation/Evolution In The News     The Book Nook     Columnist     In Memoriam     Practice Makes Perfect Archives     Topic Proposals Archive     Showcase Retired Forums     Short Subjects (No new topics or messages)     Welcome visitors