Buzsaw
As I've argued time and again, the Biblical model implies pre-flood conditions which should render modern dating methodology inaccurate. Thus if we don't know what the properties of the atmosphere were before the flood, how can we test for acurate dating?
We shall see if you want to open this can of worms and explain what difference you believe the properties of the flood could possibly have on radiometric{and other} dating techniques used.
Since there are many techniques that use varying parameters to establish dates however you may want to be careful on the hypothesis you establish concerning the atmosphere at this time.
The reason for this is thus. If you give a list of the
only scenarios
you are willing to assume correspond to the possible "pre-flood" atmosphere, then it is highly probable that there exists a method of dating {radiometric or otherwise} that will support your position.
That said,however, the same set of conditions representing
that which you are willing to accept as possible could also show you that your assumed hypothesis about the atmosphere is incorrect.
So how about it Buz? Shall we see if your contention holds water or would you like to remain on the fringes where you can make claim after claim but never test to see the validity of that claim based on your assumptions?
Edited by sidelined, : No reason given.
Edited by sidelined, : No reason given.
"Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere."
Albert Einstein
™ Version 4.2