Science Disproves Evolution

Would you please name a half-dozen or so of those techniques and the ages they indicate?

---

Disclaimer: The above statement is without a doubt, the most LUDICROUS, IDIOTIC AND PERFECT EXAMPLE OF WILLFUL STUPIDITY, THAT I HAVE EVER SEEN OR HEARD.

I asked you for a list of dating methods for a reason.This entire forum has been eaten up by discussions of one dating method at a time - meteorite dust shows the earth is young, the shrinking sun shows the earth is young, pigs' entrails show the earth is young and so on.... But what I'm getting at is: How young is young? If meteorite dust gives an age of "no more than 10,000 years" and the amount of some metal in the ocean gives an age of "no more than 100,000 years", what good is that? Where's the correlation between the different methods?We have more than enough topics where creationists roll out their parade of PRATTs and evolutionists shoot them down and the creationists say, "Nuh uh." Why can't we compare creationist methods to each other for once? If they're so all-fired superior, roll 'em out and we'll see if they can all be right at once.

---

Disclaimer: The above statement is without a doubt, the most LUDICROUS, IDIOTIC AND PERFECT EXAMPLE OF WILLFUL STUPIDITY, THAT I HAVE EVER SEEN OR HEARD.

My point in asking Pahu for a list of creationist-determined ages was to show that their methodology is severely flawed, since the methods don't agree within several orders of magnitude. How can they use such poor methodology to indict anybody else's?

---

Disclaimer: The above statement is without a doubt, the most LUDICROUS, IDIOTIC AND PERFECT EXAMPLE OF WILLFUL STUPIDITY, THAT I HAVE EVER SEEN OR HEARD.

I think this is on topic (barring any further admin rulings), since a young earth would effectively (indirectly) prove that evolution could not have happened.So show us the dating techniques that give those young ages. We need numbers here, not just "the earth woulda/coulda/shoulda cooled in less than 4.5 billion years".And one technique that gives the result you want isn't good enough to refute dozens of methods that disagree with you. Show us how the results of your methods correlate.

---

Disclaimer: The above statement is without a doubt, the most LUDICROUS, IDIOTIC AND PERFECT EXAMPLE OF WILLFUL STUPIDITY, THAT I HAVE EVER SEEN OR HEARD.

Not even close. You have been asked to produce facts. For example, you have been asked repeatedly to present the creationist determination of the age of the earth. Do that.

---

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels

Nobody cares about your opinion, as incredibly arrogant as it is. All you've "shared" is crap that even the creationists are embarassed about.What I've been asking you for is a list of creationist dating methods and the results they produce. You need to show how they all produce the same result, or they're of no value.Since you haven't done that, I'm guessing that you can't.

---

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels