Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,453 Year: 3,710/9,624 Month: 581/974 Week: 194/276 Day: 34/34 Hour: 0/14


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Science Disproves Evolution
Vacate
Member (Idle past 4622 days)
Posts: 565
Joined: 10-01-2006


Message 118 of 196 (444635)
12-30-2007 4:01 AM
Reply to: Message 117 by Jason777
12-30-2007 3:34 AM


Co-existing
So if evolution is true it went in the opposite direction.
There is no 'direction' in evolution. Think blind cave fish. (Astyanax fasciatus mexicanus)
So the evidence is very obvious that Australopithicus and Homo-Erectus must have co-existed since Homo-Erectus footprints are found in the same geologic layer as lucy.Which falsifies the theory of evolution
Why would Homo-Erectus and Australopithicus co-existing bring any problems whatsoever to the Theory of Evolution? Nothing says that a population has to be extinct for its evoloved sub population to exist. If this was the way scientists proposed that evolution works then why didn't they notice the error when all fish did not go extinct when the blind cave fish evoloved?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by Jason777, posted 12-30-2007 3:34 AM Jason777 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024