Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 87 (8993 total)
75 online now:
nwr, Pollux (2 members, 73 visitors)
Newest Member: Juvenissun
Post Volume: Total: 879,210 Year: 10,958/23,288 Month: 210/1,763 Week: 177/390 Day: 66/32 Hour: 0/2

Announcements: Topic abandonment warning (read and/or suffer the consequences)


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Uranium Dating
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16111
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 27 of 153 (573329)
08-10-2010 9:06 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by archaeologist
08-10-2010 5:31 PM


This position fails because it does not take into account the possibility that all people from the same towncould set their watch by one central time piece. let's say the town square clock, for sake of argument.

But unlike the original analogy, this has no analogue in the real world, does it?

statistical analysis means nothing for it does not exclude the possibility that everyone can have the wrong time

But the facts do exclude that possibility.

to say one has the correct time because other dating systems say it is correct doesn't mean the dates given are correct. with time, we have an ultimate govenor who regulates time and against which we can verify if our watch pieces go off.

Namely? And why can't we calibrate our dating systems against that?

in other words scientists ASSUME they have the correct date because all dating systems tell them what they want to hear and there is no objective, superior unfailing system to make corrections thus the scientists can place any date they want to an item to fit their theory and unbelief, then synchronize that date with similar dating systems because they are in control of the systems and no one can correct them.

basically the dating systems are manipulated to fit the bias of the scientist doing the dating. they are too subjective to be reliable.

Stuff you made up does not a basis for an argument make.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by archaeologist, posted 08-10-2010 5:31 PM archaeologist has not yet responded

  
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16111
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 34 of 153 (573353)
08-11-2010 12:43 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by archaeologist
08-10-2010 11:13 PM


It is the custom of these forums to reply to one person at a time.

Being coherent is also preferable, but this may exceed your abilities.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by archaeologist, posted 08-10-2010 11:13 PM archaeologist has not yet responded

  
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16111
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 131 of 153 (574270)
08-15-2010 4:15 AM
Reply to: Message 130 by archaeologist
08-15-2010 4:05 AM


It's not clear from your comments what it is you're trying to misunderstand or in what way you're trying to misunderstand it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 130 by archaeologist, posted 08-15-2010 4:05 AM archaeologist has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020