Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 87 (8993 total)
73 online now:
ICANT, nwr, Pollux (3 members, 70 visitors)
Newest Member: Juvenissun
Post Volume: Total: 879,212 Year: 10,960/23,288 Month: 212/1,763 Week: 179/390 Day: 68/32 Hour: 2/2

Announcements: Topic abandonment warning (read and/or suffer the consequences)


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Uranium Dating
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 2770 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 32 of 153 (573349)
08-11-2010 12:01 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by archaeologist
08-10-2010 11:13 PM


this is why secularists and atheists have so many problems, they think the truth changes but it doesn't. new data does not change the truth which is why so many scientists have problems with religion, they want to keep discoverying something that does not need discovering but lies in front of them all the time.

No one thinks truth changes, but what is thought to be truth can when evidence shows the truth is false. ie; Phlogiston was thought to be truth but was shown to be false by oxidation-reduction.


There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002

Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008


This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by archaeologist, posted 08-10-2010 11:13 PM archaeologist has not yet responded

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 2770 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 75 of 153 (573900)
08-13-2010 1:38 AM
Reply to: Message 69 by archaeologist
08-12-2010 7:29 PM


3. the dating systems were created by humans, and it is general knowledge that humans are not perfect nor can they construct perfect items. if they could we would not need repairmen.

Which should speak wonders for your bible which was written by humans and it is general knowledge that humans are not perfect nor can they construct perfect items. Thus by your own admission the bible cannot be perfect.

the Bible is evidence and an ancient document whose qualifications i established in another post.

The bible is a combination of hearsay testimony & bronze age mythology. It is only evidence of what early civilized men believed.


There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002

Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008


This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by archaeologist, posted 08-12-2010 7:29 PM archaeologist has not yet responded

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 2770 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 106 of 153 (574052)
08-13-2010 6:40 PM
Reply to: Message 102 by archaeologist
08-13-2010 6:22 PM


the bolded parts are a very big assumption and cannot be verified nor confirmed. such conclusions mean nothing.

And why can they not be confirmed? If a particular rock structure is dated by Uranium Dating, Ar/Ar Dating & K/Ar Dating and the same figure of 60 million years is found by all three methods than it would be logical to assume that the rock is at least 60 million years old and thus the earth would have to be at least the same age. This is not a big assumption at all.


There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002

Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008


This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by archaeologist, posted 08-13-2010 6:22 PM archaeologist has not yet responded

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 2770 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 119 of 153 (574104)
08-14-2010 1:23 AM
Reply to: Message 115 by archaeologist
08-13-2010 11:55 PM


Re: Uranium Halos and Redirect on 14C
let me illustrate it another way. i put salt in a jar and ask someone to date it and they come back saying because the glass is old and it takes 4 million years for salt to form to that specification, that i must have filled it 4-5,000,0000 years ago because all of their dating systems said so.

1) date what the jar or the salt?

either way you point is not what dating is about.
no scientist would assume the jar was 4 billion years old. as for the salt again the age of the salt would only go back to when it crystallized from solution. Your idea is ludicrous as to how dating is done. The sodium & chlorine which make up the slat would be as old as the earth but the salt wouldn't, not as salt.


There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002

Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008


This message is a reply to:
 Message 115 by archaeologist, posted 08-13-2010 11:55 PM archaeologist has not yet responded

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 2770 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 139 of 153 (574403)
08-15-2010 5:40 PM
Reply to: Message 137 by archaeologist
08-15-2010 5:10 PM


the rules have already been established by God

Your rules have been established by your god. The reason you seem to change the rules of the science forums in that you are blinded by your blind faith and anything that would put a dent in your beliefs or your magic book, to you , must be false. If all people followed your narrow beliefs, the wheel wound not have yet been discovered, men would still live in caves and the dog would not have been domesticated.

{ABE} and I wouldn't be typing on this PC.

Edited by bluescat48, : added line


There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002

Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008


This message is a reply to:
 Message 137 by archaeologist, posted 08-15-2010 5:10 PM archaeologist has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020