Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 68 (9078 total)
513 online now:
AZPaul3, Dredge, kjsimons, nwr, Phat (5 members, 508 visitors)
Newest Member: harveyspecter
Post Volume: Total: 894,953 Year: 6,065/6,534 Month: 258/650 Week: 28/278 Day: 28/27 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Radiometric Dating and the Geologic Column: A Critique
Joe T
Member (Idle past 1480 days)
Posts: 41
From: Virginia
Joined: 01-10-2002


Message 63 of 113 (166998)
12-10-2004 3:55 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by Anti-Climacus
12-10-2004 2:36 PM


Re: An Example
As is clearly seen, the geochronologist is sure to begin his experiment with rationalizations at hand, just in case.

I am sorry, but I do not clearly see this at all. I read your critique and the paper twice just to make sure. It seems to me that the only way one could come to the conclusions you did is to assign motives to the paper's authors that are not even hinted at in the paper itself. In other words it seems to me as if you approached this paper with the idea that geochronologists are skunks and picked out phrases from the paper to facilitate an amateur psychoanalysis in support of this thesis.

With all due respect,

Joe T.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by Anti-Climacus, posted 12-10-2004 2:36 PM Anti-Climacus has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022