Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9077 total)
653 online now:
kjsimons, nwr, PaulK, Phat, Tangle (5 members, 648 visitors)
Newest Member: Contrarian
Post Volume: Total: 894,065 Year: 5,177/6,534 Month: 20/577 Week: 8/80 Day: 8/11 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Radiometric Dating and the Geologic Column: A Critique
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 8971
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 52 of 113 (166690)
12-09-2004 7:50 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by Loudmouth
12-09-2004 7:25 PM


Re: What is in a name?
Didn't someone hint that he referenced his own work without making it clear that it was? That isn't really invalid I suppose but it smells to me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by Loudmouth, posted 12-09-2004 7:25 PM Loudmouth has taken no action

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by JonF, posted 12-09-2004 10:59 PM NosyNed has taken no action

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 8971
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 74 of 113 (167118)
12-11-2004 1:40 AM
Reply to: Message 68 by dpardo
12-10-2004 8:19 PM


Elaborate?
Can you elaborate on this?

I don't understand why you have asked for this. I don't know if those who have answered are giving you what you want.

A strange question to me.

It is however, very relevant. This is a hunk of rock that has "been through a lot" as they say.

From that one would expect to have to be careful in what you are dating. The whole paper seems to make that rather clear.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by dpardo, posted 12-10-2004 8:19 PM dpardo has taken no action

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 8971
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 97 of 113 (168281)
12-14-2004 9:47 PM


Time to back up
I think we need to back up and revisit, more carefully, the martian meteorite paper.

AC doesn't see what is wrong with his look at it. We have noted a number of things about it but he seems to have not read them and thought them through.

He clearly doesn't think there is need to reconsider his initial position on it. Perhaps we can go back over it more carefully and simply.

It is, after all, the only evidence he has supplied for his claims.


Replies to this message:
 Message 98 by Percy, posted 12-14-2004 10:07 PM NosyNed has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022