Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Potassium Argon Sensitivity Analysis
Percy
Member
Posts: 22392
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 48 of 64 (583874)
09-29-2010 12:34 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by creationliberty
09-29-2010 11:14 AM


Re: K-Ar Dates Not Reliable At All
Embedding videos is fine, but...
After watching the video, you can see the evolutionists that have studied this out know it doesn't work. [all the documentation is in the annotations on the video, and you can look it up for yourself] But you see, they don't base their theory on the evidence... they reshape the evidence until it matches their theory. That's not science.
But letting others do your talking for you isn't. These rules are from the Forum Guidelines:
  1. Points should be supported with evidence and/or reasoned argumentation. Address rebuttals through the introduction of additional evidence or by enlarging upon the argument. Do not repeat previous points without further elaboration. Avoid bare assertions.
  2. Bare links with no supporting discussion should be avoided. Make the argument in your own words and use links as supporting references.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by creationliberty, posted 09-29-2010 11:14 AM creationliberty has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by creationliberty, posted 09-29-2010 12:53 PM Percy has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22392
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 52 of 64 (583902)
09-29-2010 1:27 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by creationliberty
09-29-2010 12:53 PM


Re: K-Ar Dates Not Reliable At All
Repeating from the Forum Guidelines:
  1. Bare links with no supporting discussion should be avoided. Make the argument in your own words and use links as supporting references.
Also, cutting and pasting your own words from articles you've written, which is what you're doing in other threads, is not discussion.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by creationliberty, posted 09-29-2010 12:53 PM creationliberty has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22392
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 54 of 64 (583906)
09-29-2010 1:33 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by creationliberty
09-29-2010 1:26 PM


Re: K-Ar Dates Not Reliable At All
creationliberty writes:
Correct, there are lots of different dating methods. And ALL are based on the same ASSUMPTIONS. Listing the names of a bunch of dating methods does NOT provide evidence that they are accurate. After as many posts as you seem to have, I would have figured you'd know better than to try something like that.
But Frako isn't doing anything to violate the Forum Guidelines, while you are.
I discuss the basic flaws in dating methods in "The Carbon Dating Game" at creationliberty.org.
We do not debate by link here. If you have an on-topic argument to make in this thread then post the argument here.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by creationliberty, posted 09-29-2010 1:26 PM creationliberty has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024