Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 61 (9042 total)
72 online now:
anglagard (1 member, 71 visitors)
Newest Member: maria
Post Volume: Total: 885,972 Year: 3,618/14,102 Month: 238/321 Week: 54/44 Day: 5/9 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Potassium Argon Sensitivity Analysis
creationliberty
Junior Member (Idle past 3843 days)
Posts: 7
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 09-29-2010


Message 46 of 64 (583867)
09-29-2010 11:14 AM


K-Ar Dates Not Reliable At All
K-Ar dating is not reliable at all, and evolutionists that have done their homework know this, but steer clear of the topic because this is one of their "proofs" for their 4.6 billion year earth age.

This 10 minute video [click on this text] will explain it in detail. (I won't embed it because I'm not sure that's allowed on this forum)

After watching the video, you can see the evolutionists that have studied this out know it doesn't work. [all the documentation is in the annotations on the video, and you can look it up for yourself] But you see, they don't base their theory on the evidence... they reshape the evidence until it matches their theory. That's not science.


Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-29-2010 12:32 PM creationliberty has not yet responded
 Message 48 by Percy, posted 09-29-2010 12:34 PM creationliberty has responded
 Message 50 by frako, posted 09-29-2010 1:18 PM creationliberty has responded

  
creationliberty
Junior Member (Idle past 3843 days)
Posts: 7
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 09-29-2010


Message 49 of 64 (583879)
09-29-2010 12:53 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by Percy
09-29-2010 12:34 PM


Re: K-Ar Dates Not Reliable At All
quote:
But letting others do your talking for you isn't.
In your own words, please, in accordance with the forum rules.

That's me. I am doing the talking. Those are my own words. I apologize for not making that clear. I just don't feel like writing a novel for everyone else when I've already recorded it once.

Edited by creationliberty, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Percy, posted 09-29-2010 12:34 PM Percy has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by Percy, posted 09-29-2010 1:27 PM creationliberty has not yet responded

  
creationliberty
Junior Member (Idle past 3843 days)
Posts: 7
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 09-29-2010


Message 51 of 64 (583901)
09-29-2010 1:26 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by frako
09-29-2010 1:18 PM


Re: K-Ar Dates Not Reliable At All
Correct, there are lots of different dating methods. And ALL are based on the same ASSUMPTIONS. Listing the names of a bunch of dating methods does NOT provide evidence that they are accurate. After as many posts as you seem to have, I would have figured you'd know better than to try something like that.

I discuss the basic flaws in dating methods in "The Carbon Dating Game" at creationliberty.org.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by frako, posted 09-29-2010 1:18 PM frako has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by frako, posted 09-29-2010 1:32 PM creationliberty has not yet responded
 Message 54 by Percy, posted 09-29-2010 1:33 PM creationliberty has not yet responded
 Message 55 by frako, posted 09-29-2010 1:49 PM creationliberty has not yet responded
 Message 56 by hooah212002, posted 09-29-2010 1:52 PM creationliberty has not yet responded
 Message 57 by Coyote, posted 09-29-2010 1:54 PM creationliberty has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021