Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 62 (9041 total)
570 online now:
kjsimons (1 member, 569 visitors)
Newest Member: maria
Post Volume: Total: 885,918 Year: 3,564/14,102 Month: 184/321 Week: 44/59 Day: 5/4 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Age Correlations and An Old Earth, Version 2 No 1
Adminnemooseus
Director
Posts: 3934
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 214 of 1486 (679233)
11-13-2012 12:33 AM
Reply to: Message 212 by kofh2u
11-13-2012 12:10 AM


Does the Bible say the Earth is young?
With that understanding, I post what the Bible actually says, which is NOT a young earth.

Appearances are that the bulk of the creation side are young Earth.

I think many would love to see a one-on-one (or few-on-few) "Great Debate" on this issue, between the young Earth creationist side and the not a young Earth creationist side.

Feel free to propose such, or Private Message me about such, if you wish.

But such a (sub)topic does not belong in this topic.

Please, no response messages to this message, in this topic (such WILL trigger a 24 hour suspension). Go to the General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures (aka 'The Whine List') topic if you feel you must publicly reply to this message.

Adminnemooseus


Or something like that©.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 212 by kofh2u, posted 11-13-2012 12:10 AM kofh2u has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 215 by kofh2u, posted 11-13-2012 1:33 AM Adminnemooseus has acknowledged this reply
 Message 217 by kofh2u, posted 12-01-2012 7:28 AM Adminnemooseus has acknowledged this reply

  
Adminnemooseus
Director
Posts: 3934
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 1464 of 1486 (879611)
07-19-2020 12:30 AM


Has anyone seen the topic theme lately?
I'm pretty busy in the real world, so I'm not following things closely, BUT...

I'LL MAKE THIS AN OFFICIAL WARNING - ANY MESSAGES NOT HAVING SOME SORT OF CONNECTION TO THE TOPIC THEME MIGHT JUST TRIGGER A 2 DAY SUSPENSION OF THE POSTER.

Adminnemooseus


Or something like that©.

Replies to this message:
 Message 1466 by AZPaul3, posted 07-19-2020 3:57 AM Adminnemooseus has responded

  
Adminnemooseus
Director
Posts: 3934
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 1468 of 1486 (879619)
07-19-2020 5:37 AM
Reply to: Message 1466 by AZPaul3
07-19-2020 3:57 AM


Re: Has anyone seen the topic theme lately?
By “topic” are we limited to, in this thread, “Age Correlations and An Old Earth”, or are we allowed the sub-threads like presently Message 1450, Message 1451 as the latest example and other sub-topics that periodically spring from the emergent properties of topic creep?

1) Message should somehow touch on the age dating science.

2) At the minimum, message should at least touch on scientific methodology.

3) Message should not be irrelevant snark.

1450 and 1451 BARELY qualifies as meeting (2), but it would be nice if it had any real connection to (1).

Your new 1467 qualifies as being (3).

Better yet, it might be instructive if you could give us some examples of offending messages.

Might you find the most recent message in this topic, that actually does (1)? The recent quality of topic sure seems quite dismal to me.

dad is pretty much (understatement?) blathering nonsense. I think other members should post something of (1) or not respond at all. dad makes Faith look like a towering master of scientific reason. Is dad being successful at dragging the sciece side down to his level of discourse?

Maybe we need some activity at https://www.evcforum.net/dm.php?control=msg&t=15105

Adminnemooseus


Or something like that©.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1466 by AZPaul3, posted 07-19-2020 3:57 AM AZPaul3 has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 1469 by AZPaul3, posted 07-19-2020 9:24 AM Adminnemooseus has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021